I was heartened to read Bridget Bush's staunch defense of the Catholic faith. Today it was Hillary Clinton's email server. If the Russian government illegally hacked into Hillary Clinton's private email server, that is what Ms. But most importantly, instead of displaying her contorted view of what was written, she should be concerned about how WikiLeaks obtained these documents. First of all, not all Democrats think alike, so she is condemning an even larger bloc of voters for her perceived mistreatment. and Evangelicals' and 'Share a contempt for people of faith' goes beyond the pale.
Her constant characterization of the Clinton Campaign and moreover, the entire Democratic party as 'Predictably' willing to 'Mock Catholics. Bush's article is too slanted to be published, even in the opinion pages. My personal experience has been that Catholics are universally respected and thought of as intelligent, contributing members of society.
Bush goes on to recount how she has been persecuted her entire life because she is a Catholic. The statement that they flaunt their Catholicism because it is, "the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion" is spot on correct. It is a statement on the hypocritical way in which the Murdoch family use their faith as a political tool. The email does nothing to denigrate Catholics. Bush later goes on to explain, both of the respondents to this particular email are themselves Catholic. A Catholic bishop in Texas slammed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Twitter over a comment she made appearing to compare the abortion debate in the United States to rapes committed by. Bush's statement that, "The emails reflect a disdain for one-fourth of the population, a pivotal group of swing voters." As Ms. I read and re-read the comments several times, and simply don't read anything even remotely similar to what Ms. 18 soundly criticizes members of the Clinton campaign for their remarks regarding the way in which Rupert Murdoch uses his religion to advance his political position.
0 kommentar(er)
